Veal & Hudson, “Direct and Indirect Measures for Large-Scale Evaluation of Writing”

Veal, L. Ramon and Sally Ann Hudson. “Direct and Indirect Measures for Large-Scale Evaluation of Writing” AW

“Holistic scoring does indeed require less time and money, making it the most economical of the direct measures. Analytic scoring does correlate highly with holistic ratings and does provide more detailed analysis of some holistic ratings. Primary trait and mechanics count scoring, because of lower correlations and higher cost figures, may not appropriately remain the tools of the researcher concerned with more specific contexts and features of writing…The smaller cost of selecting an using an objective test as an indirect measure of writing may be advantageous if users are primarily interested in testing only mechanical skills related to writing.

If a large scale summative assessment of writing is what is needed, that in light of validity, reliability, and cost considerations, recommendations from this study call for a holistically rated writing sample as a measure of minimum competence because of its face validity, proven reliability, and economy” (17-8).

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s